30 Aug 2023
Stage | Activities | Impact of generative AI | Impact level |
---|---|---|---|
Taxonomy Design | Use case comprehension, tag requirements, category/definition crafting, overlap analysis, manual tagging, and client revisions | Expedites taxonomy creation, seamlessly handles overlaps, and streamlines revisions | High |
Model Development and Deployment | Dataset preparation, model creation, validation, and deployment | Bypasses conventional model generation steps by using intelligent prompts and optimizing model development | High |
Machine Tagging | Content upload, running the model, and output generation | - | - |
Subject matter expert (SME) Review | Asset audit, content comprehension, and tag validation | Generative AI enables content summarization, key area highlighting, and SME workload reduction | High |
Output Generation and Transfer | Reports and API tag transfers | - | - |
Model Retraining | Data selection, pipeline run, validation, and new version deployment | Generative AI–driven accuracy reduces retraining needs, allowing the effective use of intelligent prompts for efficient model enhancement | High |
Trial number | Prompt parameters | Accuracy with GPT-3.5 Turbo |
---|---|---|
1 | Category names and OCR text of the atom | 33.2% |
2 | Category definition and OCR text of the atom | 51.8% |
3 | Category definition, OCR text of the atom, and role definition | 62.3% |
4 | Categories redefined (overlaps were identified and removed), OCR text of the atom, and role definition | 89.8% |
Stage | Activity | Performance* |
---|---|---|
Taxonomy Design | Taxonomy category definition Taxonomy definition validation Taxonomy overlap analysis and redefinition | 90% reduction in efforts required for a taxonomy design with generative AI support |
Model Development and Deployment | Content atomization | New models (e.g., Segment Anything) were able to maintain the contours of graphics and identify atoms with a coverage of 93%, compared with the earlier model’s coverage of 78% |
Brand identification | The GPT-3.5 Turbo–based model improved accuracy from 83% to 93.33% | |
Therapy area identification | The GPT-3.5 Turbo–based model improved accuracy from 79% to 83.33% | |
Keyword identification –English | The GPT 3.5-Turbo–based model improved coverage from 76% to 93.33% | |
SME Review | Tag validation | The GPT 3.5-Turbo–based summary generation and attention optimization reduced SME review efforts by 54% |