#FutureReadyHealthcare
Indegene
Search Icon
Advancing Pharmacovigilance Signal Detection with Emerging Technologies
Home
What we think
Reports

Advancing Pharmacovigilance Signal Detection with Emerging Technologies

This whitepaper presents the findings from a recent survey conducted with Pharmacovigilance Digital Council, exploring the current challenges and future potential of emerging technologies in signal detection. It delves into key areas such as data completeness issues, the utilization of real-world data (RWD), and the cautious yet growing interest in AI-driven approaches. Please note that the views of the PV leaders in this report are their individual views and do not represent their organizations.

Pharmacovigilance Digital Council is a global forum for leaders in PV to connect, learn, and share best practices and to help them modernize the patient safety function. Its vision is to support Pharmacovigilance organization’s efforts to embrace innovation through data-driven, digital models to overcome contemporary challenges and shape the future of PV.

The paper also examines the potential benefits of automated causality-related case scoring, the anticipated impact of AI and machine learning, and the evolving landscape of safety signaling. Additionally, it addresses the primary concerns and considerations regarding the adoption of AI and Generative AI in PV, highlighting the need for regulatory compliance, seamless integration with existing systems, and ensuring data security and ethical standards. This comprehensive analysis provides a forward-looking perspective on leveraging technology to enhance the efficiency, quality, and comprehensiveness of PV practices.

Navigating Key Challenges in Signal Detection

Data completeness, particularly from Spontaneous Reporting Systems (SRS), is the primary concern, highlighted by 36% of respondents. SRS data often suffers from limitations such as under-reporting, variable quality, and lack of information on drug exposure. This underscores the need for comprehensive and accurate data to ensure effective signal detection. Another significant challenge, cited by 21% of professionals, is the lack of denominator data, complicating the interpretation of signals. An equal percentage of respondents identified difficulties in assigning the correct data mining algorithm, indicating a need for more robust solutions.

The high volume of false positives, noted by 14% of survey participants, can lead to unnecessary investigations and resource allocation, complicating the signal detection process. Lastly, signal leakage and masking, identified by 7% of respondents, reflect the complex nature of signal interpretation and the potential for critical signals to be overlooked.

These findings illustrate the multifaceted challenges faced by PV professionals in signal detection, emphasizing the need for enhanced data quality, improved algorithmic tools, and more effective signal management strategies.

Real-World Data: An Emerging Resource in Pharmacovigilance

The survey reveals varied levels of adoption of Real-World Data (RWD) in signal detection. A significant portion, 40%, reported moderate use of RWD, indicating its potential and growing recognition, though it has not yet become a primary resource for many. Similarly, 40% indicated rare use of RWD, suggesting awareness of its potential but also significant barriers to widespread adoption, such as integration challenges or data quality concerns. Notably, 20% of PV professionals do not use RWD at all, highlighting a gap in utilizing available data sources that could enhance signal detection capabilities.

These findings suggest a cautious but emerging engagement with RWD among PV professionals, pointing to a need for further exploration and integration of this valuable data source. In this context, the RSA-RWD Initiative by TransCelerate BioPharma Inc. is particularly relevant. This initiative aims to evaluate and improve current practices in signal assessment by incorporating rapid analysis approaches using RWD. By addressing the limitations of traditional methods, the initiative seeks to enhance patient safety and public health.

As organizations begin to explore and integrate RWD more extensively, they can unlock several benefits that enhance signal detection capabilities:

A potential roadmap for increasing RWD adoption could include the following steps:

Exploring AI-Driven Approaches in Signal Detection

Half of the respondents (50%) reported not implementing AI-driven approaches in signal detection, indicating traditional methods still dominate the landscape. However, 40% are considering AI solutions, recognizing potential benefits such as improved efficiency and accuracy. Only 10% have implemented AI-driven approaches to some extent, demonstrating early adoption but limited widespread use. None have implemented AI extensively, highlighting that AI integration in PV signal detection is still in its exploratory stage for most organizations.

These findings reflect a landscape where traditional methods remain prevalent, but there is significant interest in AI-driven approaches. AI-driven methods are becoming imperative, offering substantial benefits. Here are some key use cases that early adopters are pursuing to enhance operational efficiency, accuracy, and scalability:

Use CaseDescriptionBenefits
Adverse Event DetectionAutomated identification of adverse events from diverse sourcesFaster detection, reduced manual effort
Signal PrioritizationAI algorithms to prioritize signals based on severity and potential impactQuick actions on the risks reducing risk to patient
Data IntegrationCombining data from diverse sourcesComprehensive view, increased signal sensitivity
Predictive Risk AnalysisPredicting potential adverse events based on historical data and patient profilesProactive risk management,
Trend AnalysisIdentifying trends and patterns in adverse event data over timeEarly identification of emerging safety issues
Causality AssessmentAI-driven assessment of the causal relationship between a drug and an adverse eventAccurate and standardized assessments,improved detection of subtle signals

Assessing Automated Causality-Related Case Scoring

Automated causality-related case scoring involves the use of algorithms to systematically evaluate and score the likelihood that a drug caused an adverse event. This process leverages machine learning and AI to analyze vast datasets, identifying patterns and correlations that may indicate a causal relationship. By automating this process, organizations can enhance the precision and efficiency of signal detection, ensuring more accurate identification of true adverse drug reactions.

It is encouraging to see that a significant portion (43%) of respondents are considering implementing automated causality-related case scoring, showing a growing interest in leveraging automation to enhance signal detection processes. Conversely, an equal 43% do not use and do not plan to use automated scoring, likely due to concerns about reliability, resource constraints, or a preference for traditional methods. Additionally, 14% of professionals were unsure or found the question not applicable, reflecting uncertainty about this technology’s relevance.

The uptake of automated causality-related case scoring is likely to increase as organizations recognize the significant benefits of enhanced efficiency and accuracy in signal detection processes. As AI and machine learning technologies continue to advance and demonstrate their reliability through rigorous validation studies, confidence in their capabilities will grow. Furthermore, as regulatory bodies begin to endorse and provide clear guidelines for the use of automated systems, the perceived risks will diminish. Additionally, investments in training programs to upskill PV professionals and the development of cost-effective, scalable AI solutions will address resource constraints, making adoption more feasible. With successful case studies and real-world applications showcasing the tangible benefits, more organizations will be compelled to transition from traditional methods to automated systems, ultimately driving broader industry-wide adoption.

Anticipating the Impact of AI and Machine Learning on Signal Detection

Respondents anticipate several key outcomes from AI and machine learning implementation in signal detection. The most frequently cited outcome (28%) is a significant improvement in accuracy and precision, enhancing signal detection reliability. Proactive signal detection was highlighted by 20% of professionals, suggesting AI could enable more timely identification of safety issues. An equal 20% foresee substantial cost savings through reduced manual efforts, reflecting AI’s potential to streamline processes.

The uptake of automated causality-related case scoring is likely to increase as organizations recognize the significant benefits of enhanced efficiency and accuracy in signal detection processes. As AI and machine learning technologies continue to advance and demonstrate their reliability through rigorous validation studies, confidence in their capabilities will grow. Furthermore, as regulatory bodies begin to endorse and provide clear guidelines for the use of automated systems, the perceived risks will diminish. Additionally, investments in training programs to upskill PV professionals and the development of cost-effective, scalable AI solutions will address resource constraints, making adoption more feasible. With successful case studies and real-world applications showcasing the tangible benefits, more organizations will be compelled to transition from traditional methods to automated systems, ultimately driving broader industry-wide adoption.

For more insights into how Generative AI is influencing Pharmacovigilance, including use cases, challenges, current status and future potential, refer to our blog 'Is Generative AI Ready to Transform Pharmacovigilance?' It offers fresh perspectives and updates on this evolving space.

Shaping the Future of Safety Signaling

A significant portion of respondents (36%) emphasized the importance of automation for better efficiency and improved quality/compliance, suggesting automation is critical for streamlining safety signaling processes and maintaining regulatory compliance. This emphasis on automation is not just theoretical; it is reflected in the tangible steps organizations are already taking and planning to take in the near future. In a PV Industry survey conducted last year, 100 PV professionals provided insights into their current and anticipated levels of automation. The survey revealed that currently, most organizations (44%) have automated about 40% of their signal management processes. However, the landscape is poised for dramatic change. The percentage of organizations with 60% or more automation is expected to soar to 65% in the coming year.

An equal 36% highlighted enhanced algorithms, including machine learning and AI, reflecting strong belief in their potential to revolutionize safety signaling. Additionally, 27% pointed to using additional data sources, including real-world data, indicating the value of diverse data sources for understanding drug safety.

Addressing Concerns in AI/Gen AI Adoption for Signal Detection

The survey highlighted several critical factors influencing AI and Generative AI adoption in signal detection. The primary concern (50%) is regulatory acceptance and compliance, indicating significant apprehension about meeting regulatory standards. Integration with existing systems and processes is another major consideration (33%), reflecting the challenge of incorporating AI technologies without causing disruptions. Interpretability and transparency of AI-driven models concern 8% of respondents, emphasizing the need for understandable and trusted AI models. Similarly, 8% of PV professionals are concerned about data security and ethical considerations.

To address concerns about AI adoption, life sciences organizations should engage with regulatory bodies early to ensure compliance and help shape practical guidelines. They should invest in seamless integration strategies, including change management and staff training, to minimize disruptions. Ensuring interpretability and transparency through explainable AI techniques and thorough documentation is crucial. Additionally, implementing stringent data protection measures and ethical guidelines will address data security and ethical concerns.

Regulators can support AI adoption by providing clear and flexible guidelines that evolve with technological advancements. Establishing collaborative forums for sharing best practices and offering guidance on system integration will be beneficial. Mandating the use of explainable AI and setting strict data security and ethical standards will help build trust and ensure the responsible deployment of AI technologies in PV.

Explore the latest survey report on determining ROI for Generative AI use cases and securing funding

Conclusion: Embracing the Future of Pharmacovigilance Signal Detection

In conclusion, the integration of advanced technologies in PV offers a promising path toward more efficient, accurate, and comprehensive signal detection and assessment. By addressing the highlighted concerns and leveraging the potential of AI and automation, the PV community can enhance its ability to safeguard public health and ensure the safety of medical products. This whitepaper serves as a call to action for further exploration, education, and investment in these transformative technologies, paving the way for a more robust and effective PV system.

Members of the Pharmacovigilance Digital Council

Dr. John Price
Dr. John Price MB ChB, PhD, BSc
Council Chair
Michael Forstner
Michael Forstner
Global Head. Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance Biosimilars
Biogen International
 Dhaval Panchal
Dhaval Panchal
VP, Head Safety Surveillance, Risk Management and Clinical Safety
Viatris
Stephen Kuske
Stephen Kuske
VP, Head of Global Pharmacovigilance Operations
Sanofi
Sandy Diaz
Sandy Diaz
Executive Director, North America Patient Safety
Novo Nordisk
Sibel Guerler
Sibel Guerler
Head of Innovation, Partnerships and Process Optimisation, WorldWide Patient Safety
BMS
John Rootenberg
John Rootenberg
Principal Director, Digital Safety and Decision Support
Genentech / Roche
Sarah Freestone
Sarah Freestone
VP, Head of PV and Device Safety
UCB
Michael Murphy
Michael Murphy
Associate VP, Head of PV Operations
Amgen
Muzaffar Hussain
Muzaffar Hussain
VP, Head Safety Surveillance, Risk Management and Clinical Safety
Viatris
Leona Houghton
Leona Houghton
VP, Global Safety
Mundi Pharma
Arvind Bellur
Arvind Bellur
Executive Director, Head of PV Innovation and Transformation
CSL Behring

Writing support was provided by

Dr. Siva Kumar Buddha
Dr. Siva Kumar Buddha
Chandan Malaker
Chandan Malaker
Powered by Onetrust