Share this blog
22 Oct 2025
As commercial teams across the life sciences industry work to deliver more personalized HCP engagement with fewer resources, omnichannel operations have become the defining test of efficiency. Companies are under pressure to simplify complex workflows, scale content activation, and measure impact with greater precision, all while keeping execution lean.
At the Indegene Digital Summit 2025, Gary Holyfield (Chiesi USA), Lauren Jones (Incyte), and Anurag Thakore (Bayer) came together to discuss how they’re reimagining the way omnichannel programs are designed, funded, and managed. In keeping with the Summit’s broader theme of moving from chaos to clarity, the discussion focused on how structure, data, and empowered teams can transform fragmented operations into focused, high-value engagement models.
This recap highlights how these leaders are engineering smarter, more adaptive omnichannel systems that deliver measurable value across commercial, medical, and customer experience functions.
1. Redefining Efficiency Around Impact
In omnichannel operations, efficiency isn’t about producing more campaigns or messages, it’s about ensuring every interaction delivers measurable value to the right audience.
For Holyfield, this shift means focusing on precision and purposeful engagement rather than sheer activity volume.
“Each activity must deliver more impact and value,” he said.
His five-person team, which supports ten rare-disease products, concentrates on a small number of initiatives that can scale over time instead of spreading effort across multiple low-impact projects.
What it means for pharma leaders: Efficiency today requires clarity of purpose and measurable outcomes. Leaders must guide teams to focus on fewer, high-impact interactions that clearly move the business forward, whether that means deeper engagement with HCPs, faster campaign cycles, or stronger cross-channel alignment. This approach not only optimizes spend but also strengthens accountability, shifting teams from activity-based to outcome-based success.
2. Building Strength by Integrating Core Capabilities
Jones described how her team improved both efficiency and agility by better connecting data, analytics, and media functions that had previously been managed across multiple external partners.
“We took what was scattered across line items and brought it under one roof,” she explained.
By consolidating oversight and workflows, Incyte reduced redundant costs, improved turnaround times, and strengthened data quality. The model gave the team greater visibility into performance drivers and allowed faster, more coordinated campaign optimization.
What it means for pharma leaders: Integration is as much about orchestration as it is about ownership. Whether capabilities sit internally or with strategic partners, success depends on unified data, transparent collaboration, and cross-functional alignment. Building a core hub that combines commercial insight, data fluency, and creative agility enables organizations to accelerate learning and make smarter, evidence-based investment decisions.
3. Standardization as a Pathway to Agility
At Bayer, Thakore introduced a unified design system to streamline campaign development, improving delivery times by 30 to 50 percent across brands and markets while maintaining consistency.
He explained that the early stages of transformation often involve unexciting groundwork (aligning brand templates, taxonomies, workflows, and review processes) before teams can move on to the more visible and creative parts of change. What he implied was that transformation succeeds not because of flashy innovation, but because of the discipline to establish order first. By investing in that foundation, Bayer built a scalable system where creative energy could finally be directed toward storytelling and insight, rather than chasing approvals or reinventing assets each time.
What it means for pharma leaders: Standardization is not bureaucracy, it’s scalability. For commercial organizations managing multiple brands, markets, and agencies, establishing shared frameworks brings measurable gains in both quality and speed. It allows creative bandwidth to shift from rework to innovation, enables easier compliance oversight, and ensures that every local execution draws from the same brand DNA.
4. Strengthening the Foundation Before Scaling Technology
A strong data and process foundation emerged as a shared priority among the panelists. Jones highlighted Incyte’s decade-old decision to build its own data lake as one of the most important enablers of every new capability that followed. Thakore added that structured data and clear workflows are prerequisites for successful automation.
“Without structure, technology only amplifies chaos,” he cautioned.
The leaders agreed that investing in the fundamentals allows innovation to scale sustainably.
What it means for pharma leaders: Many organizations leap toward automation or AI before ensuring their data is reliable, connected, and actionable. This discussion underscored that the best omnichannel operations begin with disciplined data governance, clean taxonomy, and a clear delineation between systems of record (like CRMs) and systems of intelligence (like CDPs). Leaders who invest in data readiness first create long-term scalability and avoid the hidden cost of fragmented technology adoption.
5. Evolving Roles From Execution to Orchestration
As omnichannel models mature, the talent equation is changing. Holyfield explained that his team is moving from tactical execution toward orchestration, where individuals coordinate data, content, and field insights into unified customer experiences. Jones shared a similar approach at Incyte, emphasizing the importance of hiring analytical and adaptive talent who can collaborate across disciplines.
What it means for pharma leaders: Omnichannel excellence demands new hybrid roles that blend creativity, analytics, and collaboration. Traditional marketing or field skill sets are no longer enough. This evolution also calls for thoughtful change management - helping teams adapt to new tools, data-driven ways of working, and shared accountability models. Leaders should be cultivating orchestrators who connect medical, marketing, and technology to ensure that every customer touchpoint is timely, relevant, and measurable. This mindset shift turns teams into strategic partners in commercial transformation, not just campaign executors.
6. Finding the Right Balance Between Centralization and Brand Freedom
The panelists agreed that centralization can drive efficiency only when it is paired with trust and flexibility at the brand level.
Thakore recalled how the company’s move to a centralized design and content model initially met resistance. Brand teams worried about losing control over timelines and creative nuance. Over time, as the centralized function began delivering faster, higher-quality outputs and more consistent storytelling, trust grew and adoption followed.
At Incyte, Jones shared that a similar effort didn’t succeed at first but became a valuable learning moment.
“It didn’t work the first time,” she said, “but that doesn’t mean we stop trying to move forward.”
She noted that the experience helped reveal where the organization was ready and where it wasn’t for broader operational change.
What it means for pharma leaders: Centralization succeeds only when it earns trust through performance. Strong governance and measurable value creation, not mandates, convert skeptics into advocates. By balancing shared efficiencies with brand-level autonomy, organizations can scale operational excellence without diluting creativity or agility.
Closing Reflection
Panelists agreed that efficiency in modern pharma requires more than better tools. It calls for disciplined processes, empowered teams, and a culture that values focus over volume. By building on strong foundations and encouraging continuous learning, organizations can achieve omnichannel operations that are lean, scalable, and built to last.
