9 July 2025
Life sciences companies are accelerating their transition from multichannel to omnichannel strategies in an effort to create more personalized, seamless experiences for HCPs, patients, and caregivers. While many organizations have deployed tools to support this shift - ranging from CRM systems to marketing automation platforms, the ability to accurately measure the success of these engagements remains a major hurdle.
The core issue lies in attribution. Despite the availability of performance data across individual touchpoints such as sales rep visits, brand websites, email campaigns, display ads, and paid search, most life sciences teams struggle to assess how these channels contribute—individually and collectively—to key outcomes like prescriptions or conversions. This challenge is particularly pronounced for digital channels, which have only recently gained mainstream adoption in a historically field-focused industry. As digital marketing investments grow, the need for a more sophisticated approach to measurement has become urgent.
Attribution reporting in life sciences is uniquely constrained by the industry’s structure and customer behavior. Two key factors make the problem harder than in most other sectors:
The primary conversion driver, which is the interaction between HCPs and medical representatives, continues to take place offline, outside of traditional digital tracking mechanisms.
The ultimate conversion in many life sciences campaigns, a prescription, occurs in clinical settings and is notoriously difficult to link back to any single touchpoint.
These dynamics make it nearly impossible to map a complete customer journey using conventional attribution models. In a multitouch environment where offline and online interactions co-exist, marketers need more advanced tools to understand what is truly driving outcomes.
To address the attribution reporting challenge, many life sciences organizations have experimented with technical workarounds. These often involve implementing user identifiers across various channels and manually stitching data together at the database level. While such efforts can produce some results, they come with significant drawbacks:
Aligning disparate data sets requires extensive integration of work, often involving custom scripts and ongoing maintenance.
These challenges are compounded by the industry’s continued reliance on last-touch attribution models. While effective in fast-moving sectors, this approach falls short in life sciences, where the decision to prescribe is typically the result of multiple interactions over an extended period.
For example, an HCP or patient may register for a webinar after clicking a link in an email. Under last-touch attribution, the email campaign receives full credit. But earlier engagements, such as a conversation with a medical representative or a visit prompted by a paid search ad, may have played a more foundational role in driving interest and intent.
When analytics tools can’t connect these upstream and downstream touchpoints, marketers are left with an incomplete understanding of what is truly influencing behavior. This disconnects limits optimization efforts and can lead to misallocated budgets or missed opportunities to engage HCPs and patients more effectively.
As the limitations of traditional attribution models become more apparent, life sciences marketers are turning to advanced analytics platforms to gain a more complete view of HCP and patient behavior. Solutions like Adobe Customer Journey Analytics (CJA) enable organizations to move beyond siloed reporting and towards integrated, real-time insights.
Built on the Adobe Experience Platform, CJA supports the integration of first-party, third-party, and offline data sources, enabling life sciences firms to construct a holistic, cross-channel view of the customer's journey.
Platforms like these, when deployed effectively, allow brands to understand how HCPs and patients engage across touchpoints as part of a broader behavioral narrative. Rather than focusing solely on final conversions, marketers can now analyze the full arc of decision-making to uncover moments of influence, friction, or disengagement.
Personalized content delivery tailored to user interaction history.
Influence modeling that shows contribution of different touchpoints to behavioral shifts.
Segment creation based on real-time journey patterns.
Customer sentiment analysis by combining journey data with zero-party data.
Churn prediction through behavioral pattern recognition.
Omnichannel optimization by mapping transitions across digital and physical experiences.
Conversion rate improvements by identifying and addressing journey bottlenecks.
With the integration of emerging technologies like genAI in life sciences, these platforms are also beginning to offer predictive capabilities: such as estimating top conversion paths or calculating churn risk. While the long-term impact of these AI features is still being evaluated, they signal a shift toward more proactive, data-driven decision-making.
In a typical use case, life sciences brand and marketing teams can unify HCP and patient level engagement data across channels, provided there is a consistent identifier present. In digital channels, this often takes the form of a unique alphanumeric ID tied to each HCP or patient. When this data is ingested into a customer data platform, such as Adobe Experience Platform, the identifier acts as a key to stitch interactions across websites, emails, apps, and other digital properties.
Once stitched, this data can be enriched with offline interactions such as visits from medical representatives, participation in seminars, or touchpoints at conferences. The result is a chronological map of engagements that illustrates the full journey leading to a conversion event, such as a prescription or a form of submission.
With a critical volume of journey data, advanced customer journey attribution models can be applied to surface deeper insights. Two commonly used techniques include:
which attributes conversion credit based on each channel’s marginal contribution using game theory.
which rely on transition probabilities to determine the most influential path to conversion.
These models allow life sciences marketers to move beyond assumptions and identify the combinations of channels and sequences most likely to influence prescribing behavior. The result is more informed campaign planning, better resource allocation, and clearer evidence of what drives real impact.
Across the life sciences, there is growing urgency to evolve beyond simplistic attribution models and better understand how digital interactions influence HCP and patient behavior. For many organizations, the missing link has been unified, high-quality data and the ability to make sense of it on scale.
Advanced journey analytics platforms have now bridged this gap. By bringing together online and offline interactions into a cohesive framework, these tools enable more accurate attribution, deeper customer insights, and improved marketing ROI. Attribution in life sciences is becoming smarter, more data-driven, and more integrated into the strategic decision-making process.
Robust analytics and attribution solutions will play a central role in optimizing engagement strategies and driving measurable business outcomes. The question is no longer whether this evolution is necessary, but how quickly can organizations adopt the tools and capabilities needed to make it real. Connect with us to explore how we can support your journey.